Home › Forums › Refining Community › Refinery News › Rails not Pipelines may tame US twisted Oil Prices to Refineries 2012
This topic contains 1 reply, has 1 voice, and was last updated by Charles Randall 11 years, 9 months ago.
August 25, 2011 at 12:19 am #2151
Rails, not pipes, may tame twisted oil marketBy Joshua Schneyer | Reuters – Tue, Aug 23, 2011
NEW YORK (Reuters) – U.S. crude oil shipments by railroad could help to end gaping price distortions in world oil markets faster than most traders have been expecting.
Rail shipments of crude from the landlocked and oversupplied Midwest to refiners in the Gulf Coast appear set to surge next year, to nearly double the volume now flowing in congested pipelines between the regions.
The shipments, which were rare until this year, have already grown to around 100,000 barrels per day (bpd) in recent months, industry sources told Reuters. Two rail terminals in St. James, Louisiana are receiving much of the crude, while other sites like Houston are taking additional crude.
The daily cargoes between the Midwest (PADD 2) and the Gulf Coast (PADD 3) could triple to 300,000 bpd by late 2012, industry sources said. Logistics firms unveiled plans for several new crude-by-rail terminals over the last four months. Since the Department of Energy does not track crude-by-rail, there’s no official data on how much is moving.
But logistics firms say volumes are growing fast, a trend that could slash discounts of $24 a barrel on U.S. oil futures relative to oil in the Gulf Coast or Europe.
Delays in southbound pipeline construction and insufficient existing capacity have resulted in midwestern crude gluts, the main reason cited by oil traders for the unusual discounts.
Railroads are emerging as a viable option for inland oil producers to get crude to coastal areas and maximize profits.
“We’re maxed out right now,” said Bill Swann of US Development Corp., referring to his crude-by-rail terminal at St. James that receives around 65,000 barrels per day, mostly from the booming Bakken Shale oilfield in North Dakota.
“We think significant volumes of crude will move by rail for years to come, so we’re building multiple origins and destinations.” The Texas-based firm is doubling the size of its St. James terminal to receive 130,000 bpd of crude starting in October.
U.S. Development said in June it planned to build five more crude-by-rail terminals by 2013. One on the Texas Gulf Coast could receive Canadian crude, Swann said, while two others could be built on the East and West Coasts.
In futures markets, discounts of at least $18 a barrel on West Texas Intermediate crude delivered at the Cushing, Oklahoma hub persist through the end of 2012, as traders bet that pipeline bottlenecks will perpetuate a supply glut there.
Railroads could allow growing oil supply from Canada’s oil sands and North Dakota to bypass the Midwest.
“While the market frets over what pipeline will be first to bring oil out of the Midwest and into the Gulf Coast, railways are already filling the gap,” JP Morgan oil analysts wrote in a note to clients on Friday.
Crude-by-rail is gaining steam as major pipeline projects fail to get off the ground. Enterprise Products and Energy Transfer dropped plans for a 450,000 bpd pipeline between Cushing and Houston last week, citing trouble winning shipper commitments. A second major line, TransCanada’s Keystone XL to South Texas, has faced long permitting delays and staunch opposition from environmental groups.
Historically, less than 1 percent of crude has been delivered to U.S. refineries by rail. But with major southbound pipeline projects pushed back to 2013 or beyond, rail shipments are growing despite their higher cost.
It costs around $12 a barrel to ship crude by rail between Bakken and St. James, including loading fees and railcar leases, two industry sources said. The bump in traffic has left few idle tank railcars, and manufacturers are rushing to build hundreds more.
Total U.S. crude and petroleum product shipments by rail hit a record weekly high last month and reached 7,529 carloads last week, or around 780,000 bpd, up 15 percent from year-ago levels, according to the Association of American Railroads.
The trade group’s data doesn’t break out crude from oil products like gasoline, diesel or asphalt, some of which also move by rail.
REFINER INTEREST GROWING
EOG Resources Inc and Nustar Energy LP this month said they would expand an existing 20,000 bpd rail terminal in St. James to receive 70,000 bpd by early 2012. EOG says it could double that volume again quickly.
In April, Utah-based Savage Cos. launched plans to build a 70,000 bpd terminal in Port Arthur, Texas, for late 2012. The company is also in talks with refiners on the East and West coasts to ship them Midwestern crude by rail.
“Refineries that import crude are interested in getting it from us by rail,” said Savage manager Jared Larrabee, without naming potential customers due to confidentiality agreements.
Crude-by-rail loading capacity in North Dakota’s Bakken Shale is expected to rise from 130,000 bpd to 500,000 bpd next year, and logistics firms are offering to ship crude almost anywhere tracks can carry it.
Texas-based logistics firm Rangeland Energy struck a deal last month with Tesoro’s Anacortes refinery in Washington State to deliver Bakken crude starting in 2012.
Bakken’s growth has turned North Dakota from a tiny oil producer to a 400,000 bpd powerhouse within a few years, and some analysts expect output to hit 1 million bpd by the end of the decade. Meanwhile, crude imports from Canada have grown to around 2 million bpd, doubling since the 1990s.
For decades, the usual flow of U.S. crude has been northbound, from the Gulf Coast states to hubs like Cushing. As southbound flows grow, pipelines are running at full tilt. Some 166,000 bpd moved in pipelines between PADD 2 and PADD 3 in May, or triple the average level in 2009, according to U.S.
Department of Energy data. Another 28,000 barrels moved south by barge or truck. That means rail cargoes could surpass the southbound pipeline volumes next year, and potentially keep the advantage, at least until new lines can be built.
Railroad companies are giddy over the growth prospects. Berkshire Hathaway-owned BNSF railway said in February that it could transport 730,000 bpd of Bakken crude as production grows. Competitor Union Pacific Corp said it could quadruple Bakken-to-Gulf crude-by-rail volumes this year.
The shipments also risk creating new constraints. They have prompted a manufacturing crunch for suitable railcars to ship oil in unit trains, the 100-car configurations that are cheapest and most efficient.
“The growth has been so fast that almost every U.S. railcar with a tank that can ship crude is doing it,” said JP Fjeld-Hansen of logistics firm Musket, which is building a rail terminal in Bakken. “People want to get it to the Gulf Coast if they can.”
(Editing by David Gregorio)
August 25, 2011 at 12:19 am #4961
Here is interesting look into growing alternate Logistic solution to big $24/BBL discount of WTI/Bakken Crude versus Brent due glut in Cushing from both Canadian & Bakken crude coming in ontop of WTI but limited passage out to Gulf where demand is.
The delays by ignorant environmentalist halting the Canadian Keystone XL pipeline & dropped plans by Energy Transfer & Enterprise Products pipelines due lack shipper commitments are just tip of issues that keep Pipelines from providing answer until ~2013 timeframe for the glut gridlock in Cushing.
But Rail is doing stealth move to capture crude moves which have been limited to less 1% past (due cost/competitiveness vs P/L) to total Rail volumes above 780,000 BPD ~up 15% (although w/out stats full volume is hard track by rail) using unit trains! The largest growth has been in Bakken Crude whose shipments via St James terminal has shot up from 65 MBPD to over 130 MBPD. The Bakken production has grown from tiny producer to over 400 MBD next few years & possibly 1 MM BPD by end decade – increasing outflow above current P/L constraints can accelerate the new production levels sooner.
While the $18-24/BBL discounts on Cushing crudes provide current incentive for rail moves they cost ~$12/Bbl for unit trains so they wont remain competative once the planned P/L projects to Gulf complete in post 2013 time frame.
But dropping $6-12/BBL from discount will restore some sanity to US crude oil market and hopefully catch few of speculating trader types off-guard since they aren’t physical users of oil nor knowledgeable of logistical parameters (here is hoping for max damage to these types at least).
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.