Refining Community Logo

Oil, Coal Sectors – EPA “Railroading” GHG

Home Forums Refining Community Energy Oil, Coal Sectors – EPA “Railroading” GHG

This topic contains 1 reply, has 1 voice, and was last updated by  Charles Randall 12 years, 2 months ago.

  • Author
  • #2458

    basil parmesan

    Oil, Coal Sectors: EPA is ‘Railroading’ GHG Comment Period
    by Tennille Tracy   Dow Jones Newswires
    November 17, 2010

    WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)
    The U.S. oil and coal industries have accused the Obama administration of “railroading” through a set of measures to reduce greenhouse gas pollution.
    The criticism surfaced Wednesday after the Environmental Protection Agency said it would cut off comments on its new greenhouse gas guidance on Dec. 1, three weeks after the agency released the document.
    The guidance marks a pivotal moment in the development of greenhouse gas standards. Released Nov. 10, it tells state officials how to grant permits to power plants, refineries and other major sources of greenhouse gas pollution.
    “Right now, we are asking for more time in the process,” said Howard Feldman, director of regulatory and scientific affairs at the American Petroleum Institute. “EPA is trying to railroad this through in too short a time period.”
    Under standard rulemaking procedures, government agencies carve out several weeks for stakeholders to weigh in on the development of new rules. EPA is soliciting feedback on a guidance document, however, which is non-binding.
    Starting Jan. 2, state officials will use the EPA’s guidance to identify steps greenhouse gas emitters can take to reduce their pollution.
    “We are concerned that haste will once again make waste,” a spokesman for the National Mining Association said.
    State clean-air officials defend the EPA’s timing and say the agency had to act quickly to prepare for the January deadline.
    State officials also say the industry is dragging its heels on the issue, hoping Congress will intervene and block the EPA from implementing the permits. A bill proposed by Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D., W. Va.) would prevent the EPA from imposing the permits for two years.
    “There’s no need to hold back the guidance or propose a protracted comment period,” said Bill Becker, executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies. “It’s more important to get the guidance out there.”
    Debate over EPA’s greenhouse gas policies has been heating up in recent months. Several companies and trade associations have filed lawsuits to block the agency from moving forward.
    A spokesman for EPA was not available for comment

  • #5396

    Charles Randall

    This article on EPA Railroading GHG shows that the US Congress still asleep at switch compared to Canadian congress blocking the Serria club backdoor sneak on similar issue (email separately). 
    Now that Congress bills are going to be pushed back from anti-fossil industry position, it appears the Adminstration is starting to push its Federal adminstration groups like the EPA to pick up the slack and continue to destroy oil industry in order to allow more rapid advance heavy subsidized and unprofitable Green-Collar industries like Solar/Wind and ETOH. 

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Refining Community