Refining Community Logo

FCCU scheduled maintenance X CO Bolier

Home Forums CatCracking FCC Operations FCCU scheduled maintenance X CO Bolier

This topic contains 2 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by  dblewis 2 years, 4 months ago.

  • Author
    Posts
  • #25625

    Hedewandro Lucredi
    Participant

    What is it the typical time between scheduled maintenance of FCCU (feed is gasoil, RCR <0,5) and for CO Boiler ? In our case the typical time for CO Boiler is 40 months (required by law). For FCCU is 5 years (required by law < 6 anos). In this case the FCCU continue in operation and CO Boiler is stopped. The emission (CO mainly) increase a lot (+/- 5 % Flue gás CO) and we do not use any additive in the process. What is the recommendation in this situation (FCCU in operation and CO boiler shutdown) in terms of emission ? Stopped both unit ? Any additive ?

  • #25626

    I am familiar with several units that typically operate in partial combustion and occasionally operate without the CO boiler. How this is accomplished depends on the local environmental restrictions. Local regulations regarding the operation of the CO boiler vary but are generally targeted to result in only minimal CO emissions. It the regulations specify a CO level at the boiler stack, you can adjust the degree of CO combustion in the regenerator to achieve it. The addition of CO combustion promoter will likely be required to maintain control of the regenerator temperature and achieve total combustion. Keep in mind that this will increase regenerator temperature and additional steps (lowering preheat and removing heavy feeds) may be required. Since this is intended to be a temporary operation; only for the duration of CO boiler maintanence, a catalyst change is not an option. The addition of inert particles, to act as a heat sink, might be an option to lower regenerator temperature if sufficient solid circulation capacity exists.

    If local regulations do not limit CO emissions at the stack, you might be able to bypass the CO boiler and continue to operate in partial combustion. In this case, you must consider the impact on the surrounding area air quality to assure that no unsafe conditions are created. A computer dispersion model should be used to determine the maximum flue gas CO content that would result in acceptable ground level CO concentrations given prevailing atmospheric conditions and stack height.

    Assuming a safe and legal operation without the CO boiler can be maintained, the decision to keep the FCC running or shutdown with the CO boiler becomes an economic one. Changing feeds, adjusting conditions and adding additives will have a cost. The can be compared to the benefit of a 4 year versus 5 year FCC turnaround cycle to make the final decision.

  • #26515

    dblewis
    Participant

    We ran our Regen in partial combustion to help produce more steam. If the CO boiler had to be bypassed, we would put the Regen into complete combustion. This would cause us to reduce feed rate not only for the Regen temperatures but also for the lack of steam to run our compressors and MAB. We had a procedure to go from partial to complete combustion and vice versa. We had strict guidelines for our emissions. There are also State regulations for operating a boiler and for internal inspection timeline.

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Refining Community