November 16, 2009 at 1:48 am #2877
CAN WE DESALTING (NA & K) IN A REFINERY FOR OPTIMIZATION
WITHOUT ANY DESALTER ,
IF YES, HOW?
November 18, 2009 at 3:16 pm #5923
I am not sure what your point would be in going around a Desalting Unit, makes no sense to me, since they conserve water use and maximize salt removal. Some desalters used in the Upgrading Units in Canada Syncrude production have tripple stage deslating in the same vessel (CE-NATCO?).
A well functioning desalter unit is the heart of a delayed coking units effective operation and key to reaching design life goals.
The advances in second stage & tripple stage desalting have been gatekeepers in fending off problems from extra-heavy non-conventional crudes that can form water-in-oil instead of oil-in-water emulsions (ie conducts current) and are increasing in TAN levels (the organic acids interupt the normal inorganic acid corrision process from sealing off metal attack).
If you are a well meaning environmentalist type that is looking for “bugs to eat sulfur” type of green approach, forget I said looking at positive outcome from manufacturing process will be beyond your comprehension. If you are just too cheap to put the unit in ….. get over it and stop paying 4X it price in equipment replacement & operating problems.
November 18, 2009 at 3:33 pm #5922
<A timely NACE article on corrosion cost & fact that it can come from many sources….. a great deal of which are water soluble and often removed with salts/water/emulsion layers in desalter) CER>
Battling Corrosion In Refineries
November 17, 2009
Corrosion in refinery operations has been, and still is, the subject of many studies, papers, courses and web forums. Although a lot of what has been written shows that significant progress in understanding corrosion has been made, it also makes it clear that the problem continues to exist and that quite possibly is getting worse.
It is estimated that the global costs of refinery corrosion are in the order of 15B USD annually. Getting more exact numbers is not possible as refineries do not make available the extent of their corrosion problems, which is understandable considering the ever increasing environmental legislation they face. It is worth mentioning that in these costs, profit losses and loss of production uptime have not been taken into account. An analysis report by NACE International states that in the USA alone annual profit losses due to refinery corrosion may be as high as 12B USD!
Despite extensive research and vast amounts of available literature, many of the corrosion mechanisms are not yet fully understood. The problem with petroleum refining is that there is not one single source of corrosion, but many. To add to the problem, some of the corrodents might interact and increase or inhibit each other’s corrosivity. Also, physical process conditions play a role; so temperature, flow and Reynolds number have to be taken into account too.
November 21, 2009 at 1:45 am #5913
THANK YOU FOR YOUR REPLY
ACTUALLY, WE HAVE 2 SAMPLES OF CPC WHICH ONE OF THEM HAVE HIGH SULPHUR AND OTHER
IN THE MAX RANGE OF WORLD , NOW WE WANT TO USE OF THE BLEND OF THESE TOW SAMPLES
IN THE ALUMINUM INDUSTRIES .
IN FACT WE WANT TO NOW THE BLEND PERCENTAGE OF THESE TOW SAMPLES.
DO WE UNDERSTAND THIS PERCENTAGE AS PER TRUE-FALSE TEST OR NOT ?
November 21, 2009 at 3:36 am #5912
I am not sure how we jumped from decreasing salt in crude to you trying to blend two types high sulfur petcoke and make CPC for the Aluminum Industry, but its way off topic.
I also am not sure what your asking about True-False test, Blend percentages or what makes you think that any high sulfur petcoke could meet Aluminum Industry anode specifications – the sulfur and metals are usually too high, and there is usually some percentage of shot that would become dust upon crushing to make anodes.
This isn’t the blogg to answer those type of questions – you should talk to someone in merchant calcining industry or one of the experts in the CPC and Aluminum industry like CRU or Jacobs.
November 21, 2009 at 9:47 am #5911
Thanks Alot Dear Charles
May I Ask You To Give Me The CRU Information ?
November 21, 2009 at 4:35 pm #5910
Sure the website for CRU Group & Consultancy is @ http://crugroup.com/AboutCRU/Pages/default.aspx
and the best contact would probably be Calvin Graham who is in charge of Raw Materials (like Petcoke/CPC, & Pitch)
Although most of thier info is around the various Metals industry (especially Aluminium) but under “CRU Reports” heading look at “Bi-Monthly” and it shows “Carbon Products Monitor” which addresses CPC, Anodes & Coal Tar Pitch for Aluminum and Ferro Alloy applications. I did not see it here but I know they put out a 5year Forecast on Carbon Market in 2009 and it covers a lot of detail.
November 22, 2009 at 4:42 am #5909
thank so much Charlie Randall
July 28, 2011 at 10:45 am #4990
GOOD AFTERNOON MR.CHARLIE. PLEASE I SAW YOUR WRITE ON LINE, I AM AM UNDERGRADUATE IN NIGERIA. CAN U SEND ME MORE ON SALT IN CRUDE
AND DESALTING APPROACHES FROM YOUR WEALTH OF KNOWLEDGE. IT WILL BOOST MY PROJECT IN SCHOOL.
MY EMAIL IS firstname.lastname@example.org
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.