Refining Community Logo

RE: Fw: 2008 Heartland Conf. on Global Warming: Real Scientist – Skeptics vs Alarmist-Junk Science

Home Forums Refining Community Refinery News Fw: 2008 Heartland Conf. on Global Warming: Real Scientist – Skeptics vs Alarmist-Junk Science RE: Fw: 2008 Heartland Conf. on Global Warming: Real Scientist – Skeptics vs Alarmist-Junk Science

#6999

Charles Randall
Participant

I think anyone in oil industry worrying about Carbon Tax, Kyoto Protocol and Environmental limits should take time & look at the wealth of information from the Heartlands 2008 Conference on Climate Change (see links & info below).  REAL scientist who have been trying over the last several years to get their findings to the public and address a lot of holes and errors the advocates & politicians of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) avoided or left un-addressed in their review of Global Warming.
 

You will not find ANY of liberal press covering or reporting on this Global Warming Conference – especially the NY Times even though the Heartland Conference is being held in New York. Heartland had to take out their own adds in newspapers to advertise the conference & get the word out – something that never happens with one of the alarmist conferences.
 
And you will find few of the Global Warming Alarmist (especially Al Gore – who is hiding his medal & ducking for cover this week) or Kyoto Protocol Environmental advocates and scientist (assuming anyone actually finds out who they are – only about 5 of the “hundreds” to date have appeared on a list) – their absence seems to be result of severe butt kicking in last series of debates (which the Heartland conference proudly advertises) & the skeptics didn’t even have to field their “A” team list debaters!
 
The debunking of the theory, its cause and the perspective should provide arguments to politically inspired legislation based on junk science and “popular but not scientific” assumptions.  Additionally advocates are trying to overlook the complete failure of Kyoto :none 18 countries made past goals (2000-06) and never expected make future ones (2012) without huge technology breakthrough; or that Total emissions under Kyoto became much worse than before due to freedom allowed for undeveloped China & Russia to become #1 & #4 polluters now (vs. #7 & #9 previously); and reviews show Protocol is just a trading scam that led few investments in technology or new preservations of wilderness areas.
 
Regards

Refining Community