Refining Community Logo

RE: CVX Richmond Ref Pollution Stays in Homes – but it's not alone

Home Forums Coking News: DCU, Upgrader 1.Coker (registered users only) CVX Richmond Ref Pollution Stays in Homes – but it's not alone RE: CVX Richmond Ref Pollution Stays in Homes – but it's not alone


Charles Randall

You can always trust the liberal media to get the true point wrong or give miss-leading view that it is oil industry’s fault when it comes to pollution! This article is trying to make point that all pollutants trapped in the houses can be sourced to industrial pollution, and that several are responsible for cancer in lab animals. The conclusion your are led to is that air legislation needs to account for increased concentration caused/found in homes, and that large number of these are actually cancer causing agents …… no scientific proof of course & only brief mention of all the other sources at work inside a home.
The truth completely hidden here is that EPA / Environmentalist have know for years from other studies that homes anywhere in US often contain 20 times as much pollution as any outside industrial region. It is because of the closed air systems that re-circulate a wide range of chemicals from household cleaners, air fresheners / scented candles, perfumes, pesticides and others that they briefly allude too.  But this doesn’t fit the profile for going after industry & they would have to change the attack profile from industry to private homeowners / wide array of sources that would alienate their support base for a lot of their stupid legislation …… besides make a mockery of any outside air pollution until the inside air pollution has been fixed.
I have several examples that never got traction in liberal media – the EPA attack on “asbestos” insulation nearly bankrupt our school system because the hysteria Environmentalist/EPA stirred up about 8 out of every 10 schools had pay remove plain fiberglass insulation to folks in has-mat suits just to calm their parents down. The hundreds of thousands of dollars that were wasted in this effort from budgets that were struggling to meet school budgets was criminal and of course never reported upon.
Most people feel the EPA / Environmental attack on lead paint was huge success that saved thousands of children from lead poisining. Truth Truth is it probably exposed significantly more than were at risk. Studies by independent groups showed that the sand blasting reduced the paint particles to size that often remained in the air/heat ducts of homes for years (and was one first groups reporting on high levels of indoor air pollution compared to outside – but was quickly buried by EPA). Additionally the outside paint was often left to mix in with soil leading to higher level of ingestion by children, plants and animals in that area.  No one actually monitored where the sand & lead paint particles were disposed of – so many were dumped alongside stream beds or near highway locations.  I firmly believe that EPA attach on the lead in Gasoline was attempt to cover up why some area levels did not show significant decrease in water run-off or residents near highways (they also omitted that a lot of older homes/apartments with lead paint were also located near roads/highways).
I believe in time we will find that taking lead out of gasoline was an unnecessary step in removing major sources from population contact. And if lead in these levels was such a disaster why isn’t any of the Environmental or EPA groups stopping imports from China where everything from Children’s toys to food sources are dripping with lead contamination – we will not mention that nearly all gasoline imports contain some lead = around the 8 ppm level (similar our first unleaded contained during the phase-out period US) because they still use lead & have cross contamination.  
<And of all the lead sources chased to extinction in US – why the hell has EPA/Environmentalist never chased the several ounces of lead weights on car/truck tires that have been falling off along streets / roads / highways for over 40 years now without causing problems? Excuse is that lead is often used to contain corrosive acids and that these are not airborne gases at ppm levels but several ounces of solid material that will just be swept up or buried in soil – fact is lead can be completely be dissolved by most organic acids so wouldn’t you think they would lot more impact than 10ppm lead in gasoline???> 
I think it would be worth CVX’s time (and all other refiners for that matter) to do little research on true sources of indoor pollution, just how high they are compared to outside air & ask why EPA & Environmental have never taken up this serious health threat & continue to hound industrial applications that have levels which are below detection limits of modern lab equipment & must often be calculated based on raw material properties!! 
The public needs to know about not only failures and serious flaws in EPA/Environmental track records but the high cost all their programs impose on public.  Have you heard ANYONE even consider them as source for gasoline cost (no MTBE = +$0.50/gal cost, LS Fuels = +$0.7-11/gal, Methanol = $0.30-50/gal considering lost mpg/higher use & subsidized cost from taxes), or eliminating our refining system (impossible to get new refinery permitted for last +33 years & New Source approach eliminates return on projects), and having over 14 different LS fuel spec’s make it impossible to have a fungible US transportation fuel.  We don’t even have to mention lost opportunity for the worlds 4th largest crude producer (USA) to add reserves because of exempted Alaska & off-shore regions that are somehow ok for being explored by foreign competitors??

Refining Community